Cup strategies: advantages and disadvantages of Luna Rossa’s prototype
THE PERFECT GIFT!
Give or treat yourself to a subscription to the print + digital Journal of Sailing and for only 69 euros a year you get the magazine at home plus read it on your PC, smartphone and tablet. With a sea of advantages.
The six teams, the defender Team New Zealand and the five challengers, have chosen different strategies of preparation for the Barcelona 2024 America’s Cup. Those who chose the path of building a prototype, Luna Rossa and Ineos Britannia, and those who opted to work initially with two AC 40s one of which was modified to test design solutions and then also sail with the old AC 75, such as Team New Zealand, American Magic and Alinghi. The only team currently behind in preparation is Orient Express Team France, the latest entrant, which currently has only an AC 40 in its equipment and has purchased a prepackaged package from the Kiwis for the future AC 75.
So what is the best strategy ahead of the 2024 America’s Cup? The main focus of the teams in recent months has been to make the final design decisions and begin construction of the new AC 75, but which approach will have been most beneficial among those listed? Did Luna Rossa make the right choice by building the prototype?
America’s Cup – Luna Rossa’s Choices
The Italian team’s decision in part was forced since, in light of agreements among the other teams on construction slot exchanges, Luna Rossa Prada Pirelli ended up at the tail end of AC 40 deliveries. A team aiming to win the Cup cannot waste time, because in the America’s Cup it is the one thing you cannot buy.
Luna Rossa therefore decided to build a home-scale prototype of AC 75, the so-called Leq 12 envisioned by Protocol. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this choice?
The positives are several: development of know-how in construction, and making a boat that resembles the 75 much more than the AC 40, are definitely two elements in favor of Luna Rossa’s choice. Building solutions to test on an older AC 75 is more expensive and time-consuming than doing the same thing on a 12-meter boat, and also the Cup Protocol imposes a narrow range of modifications on the older 75s and much more freedom on the Leq 12.
Purely theoretically, however, and here come the drawbacks, training and testing design solutions on a 75 is more effective and realistic than doing so on the prototype. If only because you can try the crew in the ideal formation. Not surprisingly, the Kiwis modified their 75 by trying out cycling grinders who will be seen again in the next edition. Cyclists also planned on the Italian prototype, but size differences make the exercise a bit different.
This is why the “mixed” approach, testing on both AC 40 and the old 75, is probably the most comprehensive. The Kiwis basically started with the AC 40 “lab,” where the cost and time to make new components is lower, and then transferred the best ideas to the old Te Rehutai, the boat that defeated Luna Rossa in the last America’s Cup and proved to be significantly faster.
As to why Luna Rossa decided not to “unfreeze” one of the two old AC 75s, one can make several assumptions. The first is still about time: faster to do design tests on a 12-meter boat, especially if you have a gap to make up. The second relates to the type of AC 75: in fact, the design of Luna Rossa’s two boats at the last Cup proved effective as long as it came up against the other challengers, but came out with a clear rejection against Te Rehutai.
The Italian design team is aware of this aspect, and may have decided to go for the Leq 12 considering by now the design of their AC 75 as definitely outdated. Better to start from scratch, on a design that more closely resembles that of the future AC 75.
Perhaps in ideal terms it is a less complete choice than the kiwis, but they were leaving for this campaign with a major advantage in terms of design. To close this gap Luna Rossa needs radical and bold choices, entirely different from the past two Prada-designed AC 75s. So welcome the Leq 12, if it served to design a future AC 75 that could turn the tables and not simply resemble Team New Zealand, but also propose new solutions to shorten or reverse the performance gap.
Mauro Giuffrè
Share:
Check out the latest issue
Are you already a subscriber?
Ultimi annunci
Our social
Sign up for our Newsletter
We give you a gift
Sailing, its stories, all boats, accessories. Sign up now for our free newsletter and receive the best news selected by the Sailing Newspaper editorial staff each week. Plus we give you one month of GdV digitally on PC, Tablet, Smartphone. Enter your email below, agree to the Privacy Policy and click the “sign me up” button. You will receive a code to activate your month of GdV for free!
You may also be interested in.
Transat Café l’Or: Francesca Clapcich strike, overtaking Macif and second place in Martinique!
We are in the final throes of the Transat Café l’Or for the Imoca 60 class, with Jeremie Beyou and Morgan Lagraviere’s Charal taking a well-deserved victory after leading the race for almost the entire Atlantic. Beware, however, because in
Transat Café l’Or: SVR Lazartigue first Ultim, Imoca 60’s turn begins
Day 12 of racing for the Transat Café l’Or and the arrivals in Martinique have begun with the Ultim class trimarans. First across the finish line was Tom Laperche’s SVR Lazartigue, followed just four hours later by Thomas Coville’s Sodebo.
LAST CALL: Last 24 hours to participate, in Tigullio, in a piece of sailing history
One more day, just one day left to participate in a piece of sailing history. More than 50 boats have already done so. Registration closesat 12 noon on Friday, Nov. 7. Then, on Saturday, Nov. 8, the Event: the Tigullio
When it rains and is cold, no one is at sea. Except them
Let the great ocean adventure…in the Mediterranean begin. The fifth Marina Militare Nastro Rosa Il Veloce departed from Genoa: 1492 miles from Genoa to Venice, non-stop, for ten indomitable crews in doubles aboard fast Beneteau Figaro 3, boats of just
